#148 Prime Minister Tate, Brad Pit SCAM, Bonnie Blue and MORE!

0 (0s): Hello everyone. You are watching or listening to chatting with Candace. I'm your host, Candice Horbacz. Before we jump into this week's weekly roundup, we're gonna do some coffee shout outs. If you wanna contribute to the podcast, you can go to buy me a coffee.com/candace. All of it goes right back into the show and is greatly appreciated. Norman, as usual, thank you so much for the cups of coffee. You are awesome and wanders. Thank you, thank you, thank you for all of those cups of coffee. If you wanna support the podcast, you can also go to Chatting with Candice dot com and sign up for our Patreon. You get early access to episodes, you can ask questions and some bonus content on there as well. 0 (43s): Let's see what we're talking about today. I already have some idea. Today is Wednesday, January 15th. We gotta start off with the Palisades fires. This level of negligence is really, really astonishing, even for la. So the Palisades fires, which began on January 7th in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles, has become one of the most destructive wildfires in the city's history. As of January 10th, the fire has been, has scorched over 20,000 acres and is approximately 8% contained. Let's just check really quick 'cause it has been five days and let's see what percentage of the fire is contained currently? 0 (1m 30s): Yikes. So five days after the notes for this show were made, we are still only at 19% contained. That is insane. The fire has destroyed over 5,300 structures surpassing previous records and making it the most destructive fire in Los Angeles history. It has also been reported that insurance companies canceled the fire protection on residents policies. I think State Farm was one of them that did it about six months before the fires hit. A lot of people are trying to say that they were in on some big conspiracy. I think what happened is they simply had people scouting the area, saw what a mess it was, knew that they were in a drought heading into fire season and just were saying that they couldn't cover that because it was just so, so potentially disastrous. 0 (2m 21s): Which obviously they were correct. I don't know that that necessarily is a conspiracy. There were some clips of Gavin going around talking about potentially having the state do some land grabs. So that seems a lot like Maui. And then at the same time, he was gonna ban private con contractors coming in and allegedly low balling these landowners or homeowners to buy up property. It doesn't, I don't see the difference between them doing it and the state doing it. So I don't buy that for a second. Let's see what this Twitter link is gonna take us to Charlie Kirk. This is a heartbreaking piece of tape. 0 (3m 3s): Palisades resident Rachel Darvish rushes to confront Gavin Newsom begging him for answers and help. She demands to know why the fire hydrants have no water. He claims he's trying to call President Biden but has no service. So let's watch this video. 1 (3m 21s): Governor, governor, I live here. Governor, that was my daughter's school Governor, please tell me what you're gonna do. I'm not gonna hurt it on, I promise. 2 (3m 29s): I'm literally talking to the president right now to specifically answer the question of what we can do for you and your daughter. 1 (3m 36s): Can I hear it? Can I hear your call? Because I don't believe it. 2 (3m 41s): I'm sorry. Can I? There's literally, I've tried five times, that's why I'm walking around to make the 1 (3m 45s): Call. Why is the president not taking your call? 2 (3m 47s): Because it's not going through why? So I have to get cell service? 1 (3m 50s): No, let's, let's, let's get it. I wanna be here when you call the president, I 2 (3m 53s): Appreciate it. I'm doing that right now and it's to immediately get reimbursements, individual assistance and to help you. I'm devastated for me. I'm so sorry. Especially for your daughter. I have four kids losing the 1 (4m 6s): School. Everyone who went to school there, they lost their homes. They lost two homes because they were living in one building. Another governor, please tell me, tell me, what are you gonna do with the president right now? We're 2 (4m 17s): Getting, we're getting the resources to help rebuild. We're getting the 1 (4m 20s): Resources. Why is there no water in the hydrants 2 (4m 22s): Governor? That's all. That's all. Literally. 1 (4m 25s): Is it gonna be different next time? 2 (4m 26s): It has to be. It has to be right. Of course. 1 (4m 29s): What are you gonna do? I'm doing everything. I fill the hydrants. I would fill 'em up personally, you know that I literally, I would fill up the hydrants myself. I wouldn't. I understand, but would you do that? 2 (4m 39s): I would do whatever I can, but 1 (4m 40s): You're not, I see the, do you know there's water dripping over there, governor? Yeah, there's water coming out there. You can use it. I 2 (4m 47s): Appreciate it. I'm gonna make the call to address everything I can right now, including making sure people are 1 (4m 53s): Safe. Things I'd like to make sure you do. I can, I have an opportunity to at least tell people you're doing what you're saying you're doing. Could somebody have a contact? Can I have your contact information? 0 (5m 3s): He is good at politicking. He is very good at it. I don't believe that he's doing a dang thing. Oh, this is really interesting. So there is a couple that owns about 60% of the state's water. And I got into this rabbit hole a little bit, not as deep as I'd like, but essentially what, to my understanding, they were buying water from reservoirs before the water actually hit there. So you can buy water before it actually rains. You can buy water before it's actually stored so you can kind of leverage it in a sort of way. 0 (5m 43s): So then this family owned more water than the state had at one time and maybe currently now, and then would sell the water back to the state at a premium. So buying the water from, with buying the water from the citizens and then selling it back to them when they've already paid with it, paid for it through tax dollars. So it gets really gross. So let's see what this clip is. There's a couple really good ones if you guys wanna do a little deep dive of your own. But this is where unchecked capitalism is a problem. So let's go into it. Or just crony capitalism essentially. 4 (6m 19s): Hi Stewart. Hi Linda. Your city's burning down. Oh, you don't know who these people are. This is Stewart and Linda Resnick. The Resnicks own the wonderful company. Ironic, isn't it? Palm Fiji water. Wonderful pistachios. They also own preschools. They develop real estate. Linda and Stewart Resnick use more water than every single resident of Los Angeles combined. Linda and Stewart Resnick own 60% of California's water. Linda and Stewart Resnick own 60% of California's water. This California where multiple fires are currently at 0% containment. 4 (7m 4s): And a 2016 study showed that the Resnick's agricultural businesses were thought to consume more of the state's water than any other family farm or company. So while California continues to burn, you should probably know that Linda and Stewart Resnick, 0 (7m 20s): Yes, there are much longer thorough videos. If you wanna discover more about that couple, I highly encourage it because it is just insane and I'm all for capitalism. But I do think it seems really weird that you can own water. Like you can own a state's water. That does seem something. One of the few examples where I do think communism works a little bit. You know what I mean? The fire department, great idea. Maybe water that should probably com be communal. I don't know. What do you think? Do you think anyone should be able to own water? Drinking water? Maybe a spot in the mountain, right? Like if you're making delicious or if you're bottling delicious Mountain Valley water and you've got a location and you're bottling it there, sure, I'm okay with owning the land and accessing the water that way. 0 (8m 7s): But to actually own water, maybe I'm an idiot. That just doesn't seem, doesn't seem human. Like it's not hu it's not humanitarian at all. Is this gonna make me log in? Cancel What's happening here? Why don't I have volume? 3 (8m 28s): There we go. 5 (8m 33s): Nazis. Fuck 3 (8m 35s): I show him your 6 (8m 35s): Sign. That's a little kid at an anti-fascism protest in London holding a sign that says 7 (8m 42s): F off Nazis off Nazis 3 (8m 43s): Hate speech reads, actions of hate. Right? So 7 (8m 47s): To be fair though, it says fuck off Nazis. Do you think there's a bit of a double standard at point? 8 (8m 51s): I feel like it's my basic duty as a British citizen to say that I stand against racism. Refugees are welcome here and no far right group has any place in British society. 9 (9m 1s): Let all the refugees in, let all the asylum seekers in because we caused the wars we were to blame for it. So let's let 'em come here and look after them like we did deserve to 10 (9m 9s): As a people, as humanity. We've only got one world. Racism exists. I've had some of it myself growing up and it seems to be getting worse. Again, this is 9 (9m 18s): Britain. This is where we want to be. Look on that side. All basically white men and women standing together being racist 7 (9m 25s): Together. Tell me how they're fascist. Can you explain? I don't really want to talk to him. Why is that? Because I don't want to talk to the prank. Ah, why? I have no reason and you should stop interviewing. You seem little alone. Trustworthy. Why is that? Just news in general though. Alright, I I'm gonna guy with the YouTube channel, right? Alright, can I see what this is the socialist workers party. I'm trying to pull people away from the far right. Okay. Trying to mobilize his side against Tommy Robinson. 10 (9m 47s): Why are you here Rashe? What do you feel about 0 (9m 48s): Tommy about this? You're laughing at this kid looks maybe seven saying that he wants to eat a person because he's a dick. You've kind of failed as a parent and you're egging it on and cherry it on smiling like it's cute. That's not cute. The kid has goggles on. For anyone that's not watching because I don't know, you're at a protest and things can go sideways very quickly and there can be tear gas or people can be throwing things and it can turn violent. That is not how you get your kid involved in civic duty. I am firmly against kids going to any kind of protest. I think it's child endangerment and it's these people shouldn't be having kids. 0 (10m 29s): You shouldn't be having kids. You're weaponizing your child and you're morphing their little brain to be just like a miniature version of yourself instead of honoring who they're gonna be. Yes, it's your job to influence them in the best ways, ways possible and shape them into the best versions of themselves. And some of that is obviously gonna be you rubbing yourself off onto your kid. But this is entirely different. This is like, I see you're my kid as a blank slate and I'm gonna make you into a great and virtuous little protester against the Nazis in the state. It's just so gross to me. Andrew Tate is launching a bid for the UK Prime Minister Andrew Tate has announced his intention to run for Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in the upcoming general election. 0 (11m 10s): Tate has introduced a political entity named Bruv, the Bruv Party, an acronym for Britain Restoring Underlying Values. The parties manifesto includes a range of policies aimed at promoting traditional British values such as education reforms, proposing the inclusion of wrestling and boxing into school curriculum to foster discipline and fitness. Sure, that sounds great. Cultural changes. Advocating for a replacement of modern art installations with statues and monuments commemorating her historical British figures also sounds great. I am not one for modern art. I think if I, if I think if I'm confused if my 5-year-old or my two and a half year old made something, it probably shouldn't be in a museum. 0 (11m 55s): And there's been a weird intentional hypnosis against the culture, the cultures at mass, which is to get us away from beauty and architecture and detail and craftsmanship and mastery and all of those things that actually matter and inspire and are really the only human things that we're gonna be able to do once the AI takes over, honestly. But yeah, it's to get every, the idea is if you can make everything lose its beauty use, its lose its distinctions to the point where you can't distinguish between New York and the uk, from Paris, from Chicago that everything looks uniform and then you lose a sense of belonging and identity and group and then it's all one collective. 0 (12m 40s): So is that is the rabbit hole you can go into postmodernist tech, architecture and the nefarious reasons that is being propagated. We don't have enough time to do that. Maybe we'll do an episode on it because I do think it's really important immigration policies supporting zero tolerance approach to illegal immigration to preserve national identity and security. Absolutely all for that. Closed borders all the way baby. Additionally, Tate has expressed support for cryptocurrency adoption, including the creation of a national bitcoin reserve and the implementation of a blockchain technology to facilitate digital voting and weekly referendums. I have been saying this for years. 0 (13m 20s): We have voter fraud. It's not zero, this is universal. We should be using some kind of blockchain technology to make sure that every vote is a real vote and to make all fraudulent votes go to null. So that would be that all of this sounds brilliant and this is the problem before we get into the video, Andrew Tate is a master at marketing. He's obviously very intelligent. The problem is, is that he is good at playing his audience. So if he's talking to somebody and he kind of knows where they lean or what they want to hear, he can say exactly what is gonna sound like music to your ears and you're gonna be like, yes, yes, yes. This all makes so much sense. All of these things makes so much sense. 0 (14m 2s): The problem is, is that he sways with the wind and then when he has these more vulgar podcasts and he lets this other side of him out, you don't know which one is the real him. I have an idea. I think it's probably the more vulgar one. That's what my spidey senses say. But either way, you are not consistent and I'm all for letting the courts decide whether you're innocent or guilty. He has been found innocent of pretty much all of his charges. So I can't say one way or another, but what I can say is there are very troubling videos of him admitting to certain behaviors with women with his previous cam companies. And I don't think that that's a principled man or a man that is really deserving of a position like this in leadership. 0 (14m 45s): So regardless of how his political approach is gonna be or all of these reforms that he wanna make, wants to make which sound amazing and on paper they are, if it was coming from somewhere someone else, I think that'd be a little bit more believable. I just think he's saying the right things and he wouldn't know what to do once he actually got into that office. And I think that there is No chance that it actually happens. It doesn't matter that he's the most Googled man on earth in 2024, which no one knows if that's true, I don't know if that's true. He's self-proclaimed that it takes more than being popular on Google. It takes more than a bunch of money. It takes more than internet fame to get elected. I mean we see celebrities when they try to throw their hat in the political arena and we see someone like Taylor Swift who is a billionaire, so she's got a lot more money than you Andrew, I hate to say it. 0 (15m 34s): And more notable, massive following. And she couldn't make a sway in even a local Tennessee office. So I think him becoming Prime minister is not gonna happen. Not even a close chance. But let's see what he says in this video. 12 (15m 50s): The party in the uk A brief of comment. A brief comment on that, 11 (15m 55s): Yeah. UK politics is an absolute mess. Everyone's lost interest because of two sides to the same point. It's completely corrupt garbage and nobody understands anything I grew up in. I grew up on the streets, I grew up amongst a knife crime. I grew up amongst the drugs, I grew up amongst the problems. Now I'm one of the most successful and famous people on the planet and I know I can fix it because I'm more confident than all of these clowns. The chance of me becoming UK Prime Minister within the next 10 years is somewhere near a hundred percent because I'm one of the most well-known people on the planet who can self-fund and everybody understands, even if you don't like me, I get things done. I will be the next UK prime minister. I guarantee that there is a timeline that everybody's gonna live in. Every single person watching this video at some point in the future is gonna watch me become the prime minister of the UK. 11 (16m 36s): And I will fix every single problem I've laid out how I'm gonna do it. You can go to vote brav.co uk and you will see exactly how I'll fix all the issues. Leave Roman Romanian a previously once great nation. The UK was the greatest nation in the world. We ruled the seas and it has fallen and failed in the sight of this eternal wokeness garbage, feminism crap. And I'm gonna fix all of it. I am. You think women vote for you? Me. Women would vote for you. Women have voted for me every single night in my life since I was 16 years old sir. 'cause my house is full of them. Thank you. From now on, I prefer you referred to me as Mr. Future Prime Minister. We will thank you. 0 (17m 16s): Oh my God. This guy, what I will say is, can it get worse over there though? Would it, would it be worse to have him as prime minister? I don't know if that's possible. So maybe I can't believe I'm gonna say this. Maybe give him a chance you guys, 'cause you have let your country go to absolute shit. So maybe just maybe just swing the other way. We've got red pill Zuck. I'm almost done with his Rogan episode. And I will say, especially in the beginning, I'm so impressed the episode, he is self-deprecating. He's relatable. He, he tells you his struggles with media and how you can be so good at one thing and awful at other things. 0 (18m 0s): It just, it really humanized him in a really cool way. And I know a lot of people are giving him shit and saying that he's just copying whatever Elon does. He's not trustworthy. What do you think about the shift? What I see a lot that's happening on the right right now is when people have a change of heart or a change of mind on an opinion, let's say covid, let's say cens censorship and they start coming over and saying, that was wrong. I was wrong. I believe in the freedom of speech. I'm becoming a freedom of speech absolutist the way that the government handled covid is wrong, whatever it is, whatever that shift is to more of a right leaning narrative or honestly just like a centered perspective, the right is kind of not offering so much grace or forgiveness. 0 (18m 50s): And what I would caution with that is that starts to, that starts to emulate the woke left. Like what woke is and progressivism, which is the religion of ideology, of virtue and group think. And if you don't, if you're not with the team, you are an other and there is no room for forgiveness. It's cancel culture, right? You did one thing 10 years ago and there's no path to forgiveness or grace or evolution. That is what the left is about. So anyone on the right who is doing that, I would say try to offer an on-ramp to welcome these people in. Now there's going to be exceptions, right? 0 (19m 30s): Like a fauci all of a sudden was like, I don't believe in gain a function research or the way that I was mandating vaccines or masks. I wouldn't do that again. Or I mishandled the entire pandemic. Please forgive me. I would say throw that guy off of a cliff still, I can't trust him as far as you can throw him. But those are exceptions. I think widely speaking, if someone has a change of heart, you should offer some grace and forgiveness and welcome more people onto your side because that's how you win elections, that's how you win the culture wars. And you're not gonna get it by permanently outcasting anyone who made a mistake. So let's look at the Zuckerberg quote from X, this is a Benny Johnson tweet or an XA Zed I think is what Mark Andreessen is calling them. 13 (20m 18s): So at the beginning it kind of seemed like, okay, we should give a little bit of deference to the government and the health authorities on how we should play this. But when it went from, you know, two weeks to flatten the curve to, you know, and like in the beginning it was like, okay, there aren't enough masks, masks aren't that important to, then it's like, oh no, you have to wear a mask and you know, all the, like everything was shifting around. I, it's become very difficult to kind of follow and, and this really hit the most extreme I'd say during, it was during the Biden administration when they were trying to roll out the vaccine program. And now I'm generally like pretty pro rolling out vaccines. 13 (21m 1s): I think on balance the vaccines are more positive than negative. But I think that while they're trying to push that program, they also tried to censor anyone who is basically arguing against it. And they pushed us super hard to take down things that were honestly were true, right? I mean they, they basically pushed us and to, and said, you know, anything that says that vaccines might have side effects you basically need to take down. And I was just like, well we're not gonna do that. Like, we're, we're clearly not gonna do that. I mean that that, that that is kind of inarguably true. 14 (21m 41s): Who is they? Who's telling you to take down things that have Yeah, it was, it was people that talk about vaccine side effects. 13 (21m 46s): It was people in the, in the Biden administration. 0 (21m 48s): So some people are saying, anyone that says basically in the same sentence as lying, I don't think he's lying. I think he's being really honest. I think it's actually brave still because even though Trump won, he's gonna be in office the beginning of next week and it, it does seem like a more welcoming cultural environment to say these things. It's still risky and I don't know, if I had three letter agencies and the government that was calling and screaming at me and banging on doors and telling me how to run my company, I'd be pretty scared. So I think he is, he just threw them all under the bus. So I think this is great. I think that he doesn't, I don't dunno if deserve is the right word, because he does like, he does need to know how wrong he was. 0 (22m 35s): But I think that's what this is, right? He goes on the world's largest podcast to say how he was pressured to say that he made the wrong decisions and to say that he would do it again, wouldn't do it again, and that he's going to take more of a, an approach similar to what Elon's doing with community notes, not hiring these third party fact checkers. I think it's all good stuff. I mean I wouldn't, I still wouldn't trust him, you know, I mean I'm guarantee he's still selling your data to China and all of that. So there's that part of it. But I, I do think hopefully that he is going to allow some worse free speech on his platforms and hopefully get rid of some of the censorship that exists. Whether it's for politically right-leaning people for people that have gun channels would be a good example for people that are promoting sexual wellness, like promoting CBD. 0 (23m 27s): All of these things are currently really throttled. So I'd like to see how that changes in the upcoming months. The problem too is all of this coding is so entangled to how do you begin to take off all of these throttles and these breaks? I don't know, I obviously am not a coder. Maybe it's much more simpler than I'm imagining, but hopefully in the next couple months we'll see a really big shift when it comes to censorship. The next one is really interesting. I finished this episode with Mel Gibson and it was, it was kind of a hard watch for me. He's an interesting dude, very animated when he talks I felt like he was more like in character, but I heard that's actually just how he is. The thing that got a lot of attention is he is sharing a story about some alternative medicines that have cured his three friends cancer. 0 (24m 15s): Now let's watch the clip and then we can dive into the rest of it after. 15 (24m 20s): I'll tell you a good story. 14 (24m 23s): Okay, 15 (24m 25s): I have three friends, all three of 'em had stage four cancer. All three of them don't have cancer right now at all. And they had some serious stuff going on 14 (24m 36s): And what did they take? 15 (24m 39s): Jesus, they took some, what you've heard they've taken 14 (24m 45s): Ivermectin, fol femazole. Yeah that stuff. Yeah, I'm hearing that a lot. 15 (24m 50s): They drank hydrochloride something or other. 14 (24m 52s): There's studies on that now where people have proven that they've people 15 (24m 55s): Drinking methylene blue and stuff like 14 (24m 57s): Yeah methylene blue, which was a fabric dye. Yeah, yeah it was a textile dye and now they find out it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah, this stuff 15 (25m 8s): Works man. 14 (25m 10s): And there's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange because again it's profit. When you, when you hear about things that are demonized and that that turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well what is going on here? How is, how is our medical institutions, how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable. 0 (25m 33s): Okay, so before anyone jumps to any conclusions, there are currently some peer reviewed papers showing ivermectin as an immunotherapy for cancer. I'm gonna pull that up right now. Indeed. So this one right here is by Dr. Thomas Eichman. Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer. This is the abstract. We show that the treatment with the FDA approved anti-parasitic drug ivermectin induces immuno immunogenic cancer death cells ICD and robust T-cell infiltration into the breast tumors as an allocentric modulator of the A TPP two X four, P two x seven axis, which operates in both cancer and immune cells. 0 (26m 27s): Ivermectin also selectively targets immunosuppressive populations including myeloid cells and tregs resulting in enhanced T tregs ratio while neither agent alone showed effect efficacy in vevo in vivo combination therapy with ivermectin and a checkpoint inhibitor inhibitor, sorry guys. Anti PD one antibody achieved synergy and limiting limiting growth by by a, what do you call them? It's the P 0.03. It's been a long time since I was in school guys and promoted complete responses P less than 0.01. 0 (27m 8s): Also leading to immunity against contralateral re-challenge with demonstrated anti-tumor immune responses going beyond primary tumors. This combination achieved significant reduction in relapse after neo neoadjuvent and rejuvenate treatment. A potential and potential cures in metastatic disease. Statistic statistics, statistical modeling, confirmed bonafide synergies, active activity in both the rejuven and me metastic settings. Ivermectin, oh my god, I can't talk, this is why I'm not a doctor because I am not smart enough. 0 (27m 53s): Ivermectin has dual immune immunomodulatory and ICD inducing effects in bra breast cancer. Converting cold tumors hot thus represents a rational mech mechanist mechanic. Mechanistic. Mechanistic, oh my god, mechanistic partner with checkpoint blockade. What I just read with my lay person's brain was that it works, that it signi it, it statistically a statistically significant amount, which was like the P 0.03 that it works. 0 (28m 34s): Also if you're dying of stage four cancer, wouldn't you just throw the kitchen sink at it? Like I don't think it's dangerous at that point. Maybe if you're earlier on it's like stage 1, 2, 3 is still pretty significant. Maybe start with more of the traditional things, like obviously go find an oncologist that you has really great reviews. I would be trying everything. I would be going east and west. I would be you know, doing my essential oils and eating keto and like watching what I think and meditating and ice bath and sauna and drinking this blue dye that they talked about. And I would also be talking to my doctor kitchen. 0 (29m 14s): Sink it baby. In other news, the FDA bans red dye number three, amid health and political speculation, the US FDA has officially banned red dye number three from the food foods due to its cancer risks. This decision comes after Europe and Australia had already banned the die for similar health conditions years prior. The move has sparked discussions on social media and many attributing the band to the influence of RFK Junior who has been vocal about food safety issues and is and is anticipated to take a significant role in health policy. You are telling me that our scientists are not as good knowledgeable or up to date as the Aussies. 0 (30m 4s): You want me to believe that for a moment? There's no way. So the only other thing is negligence or greed. Maybe a combination of both. But if we knew, which we absolutely did that red dye number three was highly carcinogenic, carcinogenic, carcinogen, carcin. You know what I'm saying? That it was a carcinogen to that level that everyone else is banning it. Why the isn't our food? Why am I giving that to my kid? I'm not, I certainly am not giving that to my kid. But lots of parents did and they didn't know better. Now my question is what's the difference between, let's ask chat GBT my best friend, what's the difference between red dye number three and red dye 40? 0 (30m 53s): Because 40 is the one I hear a lot about and that I believe has the connection to behavioral issues like a DD aggression. Red dye three and red dye 40 are both synthetic food colorings but different in composition application and regulatory status. Here's the breakdown of the differences. Chemical composition red dye number three is made from iodine containing organic is from an iodine containing organic compound. Organic doesn't mean anything folks remember that its chemical structure includes sodium and iodine atoms giving it a pink red hue. 0 (31m 34s): Red dye 40 is made from coal tar or petroleum. So they banned the one that is made of the iodine containing organic compound. And again, cyanides organics is an organic compound so don't let that mislead you. But the one made from coal tar and petroleum is still in your food shelf. Red dye 40 is more shelf stable compared to three is more stable chemical. Excuse me, it's a more stable chemical. Hmm. Red dye three is a bright cherry pink color red dye 40 is a deep red. We can't get rid of our deep red food guys, red dye three is used in candies, Marino, cherries, baked goods and certain medications. 0 (32m 21s): Limited use because of health concerns. Well we've just got rid of it. So how long until it's not in production is also the question. Do all of these factories have to immediately get rid of it? Do they get to finish out whatever, whatever they have in stock? Probably the latter. Red dye 40 is widely used in soft drinks, snack food, cereal, dairy products and cosmetics favored due. Its due to its stability. Regulatory status. Red dye four three is in the US is partially banned due to linking it to thyroid tumors. It is prohibited in cosmetics and external drugs but allowed in some food and ingestible drugs banned in several other countries. 0 (33m 4s): Red dye 40 is approved for use in the us It is controversial but has not been banned. Studies have suggested a potential link link to hyperactivity in children, especially those sensitive to artificial dyes. Guess what? All of your kids are sensitive to artificial dyes. Every single one of them. There's not a single kid that is not sensitive to dyes or to sugar. That is just a human element. This is not natural. You're not supposed to eat it. You don't get to feed your kid this tra this trash and say you are bad. Go go take a timeout. Like maybe stop giving your kid this fricking poison. But you already know my rant on that. Health concerns red dye three classified as potential carcinogen by the FDA based off of animal studies showing thyroid tumors has led to more restricted usage over time. 0 (33m 49s): Good red dye 40 linked to behavioral issues such as hyperactivity in children and those that with other sensitivities or A DHD considered less toxic than red dye three but still remains under scrutiny. Guys, please stop eating this junk. If you go to movie theaters and you wanna thing of Twizzlers and it's once in a blue moon, you know that's probably not gonna do much. It might make your kid act a little bit crazy for a few hours. I don't see the issue, I'm not a zealot about this stuff, but it's the people that are saying they don't have time to make proper food that are using or that are one of the, it's something like, I don't know the number of Americans, it's alarmingly high but almost 80% of all of their calories being consumed are from processed foods. 0 (34m 37s): I'm talking to those people. You gotta stop. You have no idea who you are. You become so disconnected, you're gonna be so unhealthy, you're gonna pay for it later. Just throw it all away. And if you don't know what to make, just throw on a steak, throw on some veg, call it a day, right? Anyone can make a steak, anyone can make a burger. Anyone can make scrambled eggs. Start with those whole foods and go from there. You don't need to be Gordon Ramsey to be healthy. You can do it on a budget. There's really no excuse, but ignorance is no longer one stability. We already went through that Red dye 40 is more stable so that's why they love it. 0 (35m 17s): Doesn't sound like either is great. They're allegedly saying red dye 40 is healthier. I don't know that I would be trusting what healthier means. I would just say don't eat it, don't put it in your body and certainly don't put it in your little's body. Moving on cart girl has a wild interaction with a golfer. Instead of being a cart girl, you should start a bakery with that cake. Said probably a 65-year-old white man. Let's find out 16 (35m 43s): Sweet 17 (35m 43s): For Halloween. Perfect. 16 (35m 45s): Oh my god. Okay, glad somebody finally got it. Wow. So smooth. Bloody Mary. Bloody Mary. Yeah. Do you like it spicy 17 (35m 56s): A little bit? Sure, 16 (35m 57s): A little bit. What about you 17 (35m 59s): Like drinking? I like mine and some leggings and a yellow jacket. 16 (36m 3s): Yellow, white, whatever. Be color boy or 17 (36m 6s): A dirty ass jacket. How about that? 16 (36m 8s): Just kidding. Stupid. 17 (36m 12s): May I do? What do you like to drink? That's non-alcoholic. I'm recovering alcoholic. Oh recover. Wow. Recovering from last night. 16 (36m 20s): We got a comedian on our hands. I love it. Shit. 17 (36m 22s): You want, you wanna start laughing? You and me both bump the shorts down. You guys have anything to eat? 16 (36m 31s): I got eventually 17 (36m 32s): Besides yourself. 16 (36m 37s): I so love it. You gotta come around more often. It's it's, it's it's, 17 (36m 40s): It's all the time. Oh I'll be coming. 16 (36m 45s): Shit we have to go. It's hilarious. 17 (36m 48s): It looks like that we'd have to go two or three times. You have like two 16 (36m 51s): Seconds each trim. Yep. 17 (36m 53s): Some girls don't like them this quick but at least I'm quick and painless. You guys have iced tea. 16 (36m 60s): I have Arnold Palmers 17 (37m 1s): Dude instead of fucking cart girl you should start a bakery with all that cake that has a Betty Crocker out of business. God damn 16 (37m 12s): Fuck. I'm done. 17 (37m 15s): I think so. Fucking nice is disrespectful to sit down. Oh my 16 (37m 18s): God. Really wasn't expecting this. A little. 17 (37m 24s): You never are. 16 (37m 27s): YiIVEM heard it. YiIVEM 17 (37m 29s): Heard. I can keep going. I'm kind of just testing the waters on some. 16 (37m 35s): Oh my god. Okay, thank you. Spicy bloody, I 0 (37m 38s): Put like a, so I worked at a Hooters in Myrtle Beach golf capital of the country basically. And this is par for the course. I also was a cart girl once or twice and a caddy girl once or twice. Golfers are a special breed of man, especially when they're on vacation. The problem is, if she's really upset about it, if you watch the video, she's laughing, she's flirting. She's also, you know, she's playing the game and that's a game. She wants a big fat tip. So she'll be like a little bit flirtatious and kind of give him the attention he wants. He'll say a couple of crude things, they go on their way. She seemed, I don't know if there was a, let me see if there's a caption to what she wrote. 0 (38m 22s): She just said it's the wildest interaction I've ever had. She doesn't seem to have a big issue with it, which is fine. If she was like, this guy's a, a harasser, then I would call bullshit. 'cause you're welcoming and welcoming it at that point. I don't know it has it, it starts a bigger conversation of just because you're in the service industry, do you have to tolerate overtly sexual comments and behavior. I mean when I was waitressing you'd have guys come in and like grope you so like actually physically grab you without permission. So there's definitely a line. It seems to get crossed often and a lot of girls tolerate it because they want a big, a big tip at the end of the night. 0 (39m 3s): And I actually used to make more money working at Hooters in a double shift than I would make in the same amount of hours on set when I first started shooting. And while like that was amazing 'cause I think it kept me, it kept me from doing scenes strictly for money. Like it, it, it actually protected me in a lot of ways. But it just shows you how much money there is in the service industry. If you're wearing a tight outfit and you're around a bunch of dudes and it, part of the game is, is flirting. So I don't know, I don't know. I think it will always exist and if you don't wanna deal with that kind of behavior, just get a different job. But it can get really exhausting. 0 (39m 44s): OF modeled Bonnie Blue says that she has broken the world record by sleeping with 1,057 men in just 12 hours. Let's watch this. Oh my god, 19 (39m 58s): The big 1000 was completely done. So it started off, I'll give you a bit overview gang bangs after gang bangs to start with, it was just like the room was absolutely full. Then we did groups of five, like one after the other of fives. I wanted to give people more time. So then it went down to like one-on-ones, didn't it? So like one person would watch whilst I was with somebody and then it would literally just be like a rotating circle like that. 0 (40m 23s): Hey Siri, how many seconds are in 12 hours? What is 43,200 divided by 1057? So each guy got about 40 seconds. If this is true, I don't think this is true. I do think she probably slept with a lot of men, a lot of men. I don't think that it's physically possible to get through a thousand 1057 in 12 hours. Especially if she just made that claim that she went down to one-on-ones to give them more time. 0 (41m 6s): What I think she's doing is she's marketing herself incredibly effective. She knows that people are gonna be talking about this, that it's salacious and it's gonna get a lot of people to subscribe to her account to see this mess. One of my internet friends, Phil Labonte reposted, reposted her and said, okay, fine ban OF already. And I commented and said, this is kind of like when you have some kind of monster that misuses a firearm and everyone says to ban all firearms. 0 (41m 47s): Most people that have a firearm are responsible gun owners. Most people that have an OF or that are in the adult space are responsible. I think women like this are the outlier. Even if she didn't, even if she didn't get to the numbers she's she's claiming, which is my belief, I think the example she's setting is obviously not healthy for anybody. But I don't think she's concerned about that. She's just trying to get paid and I'm sure that she is and that's fine. I believe in, I'm a free speech absolutist. You all know that. And that includes porn. I sorry guys. It does. I believe people have the freedom to make whatever kind of mistakes they want and to live the lives that they want so long as they are not negatively affecting or hurting anyone else. 0 (42m 32s): I don't think it's ethical. She was saying that she's, you know, sleeping with fresh 18 year olds and putting them on camera. I wouldn't be okay with a man doing that. So I'm not okay with a a woman doing that. I, I think eighteen's too young. I just, it's not great. It's not great behavior, but it's her life. I do think it's gross, I'll say that. And I do think that she is probably gonna regret this, but we'll see. I'm not her and she's free to do what she wants. It's just not for me. I just don't, I don't love that how influential some of these people are and that it can, you know, rub off onto young girls. 0 (43m 16s): And honestly the right is just as guilty as anyone else because when we retweet and when we're talking about it, like I'm talking about it, you give it more attention and then it gets more likes. And then you have these young people that are like that, that X, that Zed if you wanna, what was he calling it? Whatever I'm gonna say Tweet had 21 million views. So let alone on all the other counts that one tweet throughout had 21 million views. You're gonna have a young impressionable girl that's like, I can be so rich and famous if I do this. Please don't. Please don't. First of all, you're not going to be, this is an anomaly, absolute anomaly. Just don't do it. But for her, she's a grown ass woman. 0 (43m 57s): Do what she wants. Women. Oh gosh, this woman, it was scammed out of over 800,000 pounds. I thought it was 80 grand when I was talking to a friend earlier. 800 and I think it was 830 pounds. So roughly $900,000 by a catfish pretending to be Brad Pitt. And not like this woman lived under a rock and didn't know it was Brad Pitt and she just thought it was a handsome guy she was talking to. No, she thought she was talking to actual Brad Pitt. And this woman is a regular looking lady, regular looking older lady. 0 (44m 38s): So not at like, not like a 50-year-old J-Lo bang and bod can compete with 20 year olds. I'm talking a regular 50-year-old lady, right? And you think that Brad Pitt is in love with you. The I need some of that confidence, please just gimme a little bit of that because I, it's not, it is not even close to that level. There is a full article. I heard it's worth the read. I got some screenshots sent to me. It is insane. This woman posted a picture of her skiing with her husband Catfish swoops in and is like, my son needs a woman like you and enter Brad Pitt. 0 (45m 21s): So then she believes that she's now having these intimate conversations with Brad Pitt divorces her husband gets about 730,000 pounds in the divorce. Ends up she starts sending Brad Pitt money. Brad Pitt money. He says that he has this terminal illness and he needs, he needs life saving surgery that is gonna cost 60,000 pounds. She does one transfer for 60,000 pounds. We're gonna show some pictures. Please put the pictures here, insert pictures here so people can see how freaking horrible these AI generated photos are. And she falls for this. He's like holding up a sign that says, and I love you, but he looks like he's being held captive. 0 (46m 6s): There's a picture of his like perfectly smooth face undergoing surgery. Like that's a thing. Just these pictures are so unbelievable but it shows the delusion. And eventually she ends up paying someone else who claims to be an FBI agent that's gonna help her get her money back. And she sends that guy a bunch of money. So then she ends up in the hole and she's now suing for fraud. But I don't know who she's suing. I couldn't find that in the article. There's no one to sue. These are giant warehouses in Ghana filled with hundreds of thousands of devices that are coming up with these concoctions. There's no one to sue. You have to use your frontal lobe. This is insane. There is clearly no executive function happening in this lady. 0 (46m 48s): On a sadder note, she's obviously very lonely, very depressed and that she needs some kind of connection, which is why she is the cognitive dissonance that's happening here. To avoid pain, to avoid reality, to believe that Brad Pitt just is waiting for his divorce with Angelina Jolie so he can come be in your arms is bananas. Like you have to be so lonely for you to trick yourself into thinking that's a reality. The reason I wanted to cover this, not because it's so ridiculous, but because I have had countless issues with catfish. Some very dangerous, some very terrifying, some that have involved the authorities. 0 (47m 30s): And there was a time where I would just try to fight all these accounts and take them all down and put up these PSAs like especially around the holidays. Please don't fall for this. But when I see this level of retardation, because that's what it is, I know some people can't be saved and this is modern social Darwinism at its finest. And this is just plucking off the weak to save the herd because this is insane. It made me feel a little bit better because I'm like, there's really nothing I can do. It's an exhausted effort and that sucks. I can't say I feel bad when it's this dumb, I just can't, the littler ones, maybe some are more convincing, but again, I don't know where you have to be in your life to send someone money that you've never met. 0 (48m 19s): Especially when it's fricking Brad Pitt or a celebrity. Tim Kennedy posts a bunch of this, he has a bunch of catfish as well. And he'll post fake passports that people have concocted and you can tell they're fake. You just need to spend half a second glancing at it. And you're like, that's clearly not a real passport photo. So people pretending to be him as well. So this is any person on the internet, especially if you're like a public facing personality, it's, it's just gonna happen. And I don't really know a solution. I don't know if we're gonna ever be able to figure out which accounts are bots and be able to weed them out and hopefully not have them on a, on the platform. Unfortunately, the only solution I see right now is going on something like mines, which is using blockchain technology I believe, or at least that's, that is part of their long-term vision for the company. 0 (49m 9s): But I don't see there being a solution other than using some portion of your brain, just like a little bit of your brain. Please, please, please, please. And this woman's daughter was telling her, you're being scammed, mom, please stop. This woman lost everything. And she's like, well, when you see us together, when you see me with Brad Pitt, you're gonna say, sorry, your daughter was right. You should have listened. You idiot. And now you're sleeping on your friend's couch, your Penn list and you have a go fund me to try to recuperate your damages. Oh my gosh, you need to go back to your husband and just beg forgiveness. Just beg for forgiveness. 0 (49m 49s): Good God. Let's end on a positive note, shall we? Is this a genius dog? It's a french bulldog that can do math better than most people. I'm not sure that there is any such thing as a smart Frenchy, but let's find out. That's not a Frenchy. It's a huge Frenchy. 20 (50m 15s): What the, yeah, 12 divided by four. How does he know I have to work that out? 120 divided by 12, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10. 0 (50m 44s): No way. 20 (50m 46s): Six times three divided by two. What? How do you know? Are you for real? How do you know? 0 (51m 6s): Is this real? I feel like we're getting duped either way. That's actually really adorable. So for anyone that's not watching, which I highly recommend you do, you can do that on Spotify or YouTube. But the dog is sitting there and she has her fist out and he's pawing at her hand counting the answer accurately to all of that, which is really con, I would start trying some other stuff like start asking him philosophical questions and see like have like a yes or no, like a hand. That's yes or no. I don't know. I'd start asking that dog some more serious questions other than math. That was actually very impressive and I don't wanna ruin it. So I'm gonna tell myself that it's real. 0 (51m 48s): Let's see. I wanna answer my question. Where here on the ranking for intelligence for dog breeds, what number does a French bulldog come in at? Poor Frenchies Frenchies rank 109th out of 138. As far as intelligence goes, why the low ranking French bulldogs are independent and stubborn traits often mistaken for lack of intelligence. However, they're highly intuitive and form a strong bond with their humans, making them wonderful companions despite their ranking. Poor Frenchies, I'm a German Shepherd girl myself, I will be forever. 0 (52m 34s): Well that's it for this week's episode, our weekly roundup we got, we got a lot in. Thanks for hanging out. Thanks for hanging in there. Hopefully you liked our funny video at the end. Make sure you hit like and subscribe. Give us a five star reading rating and then check out our sponsors and affiliates below. Share this with a friend or two. It'll help the channel grow, help the podcast grow and we will see you for the next episode. Bye everybody.